Secure America Act
Gives the Department of Homeland Security extra money for border and immigration enforcement, in seven amounts that add up to $69.545 billion. The largest single amount is $31.075 billion for Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The money is for fiscal year 2026 and can be spent until September 30, 2029.
What this law changes
Not checked yetGives the Department of Homeland Security extra money for border and immigration enforcement, in seven amounts that add up to $69.545 billion. The largest single amount is $31.075 billion for Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The money is for fiscal year 2026 and can be spent until September 30, 2029.
This account is written from the law's official text. A person has not finished reviewing it.
Transparency Score
The Transparency Score is the share of this law’s dollars that goes to what the law says it is for.
Transparency Score
Not checked yetThe score appears after a person reviews which sections are within the stated purpose.
The text of this law states these dollars.
- Appropriated
- $69,545,000,000Money the law itself provides
- Authorized
- $0Permission for a later law to provide money
- Rescinded, cancelled or reduced
- $0Shown apart. Not subtracted.
- Open-ended amounts
- 0Words such as “such sums as may be necessary”: no amount is named
The dollar amounts:Confirmed from the official record
The dollar totals are read. No reading of this law is approved by a person yet, so the dollars are not split and the score is not given.
How this is counted
- Transparency Score: dollars in sections a person approved as within the stated intent, divided by total dollars in the law. Shown as a percentage. Higher means more of the money goes to what the law says it is for.
- Beside it, the same two numbers the other way round: total dollars divided by dollars within the stated intent. 1.00 means every dollar is within the stated intent. When no dollar is within the stated intent this ratio cannot be computed, and the answer says so.
- Total dollars: appropriated dollars plus authorized dollars, read from the law's text by the rules below. Dollars in a section whose reading is unclear or was not read count in the total and are shown apart as unclear.
- A law whose text provides and authorizes no dollar amount reads "No money in this law". Its score is the share of its words that are in sections within the stated intent.
- The score reads "Not checked yet" until a person approves the law's reading of which sections are within the stated intent. The dollar totals need no reading and are shown before that.
- The dollar totals read "Not checked yet" when more than 10 percent of the dollars read could not be sorted by the rules.
- Every dollar amount in our saved text of the law is read: "$1,234,567", "$5 billion", "$2.5 million". Margin notes, page marks and the table of contents are left out. Each amount is kept with the words printed around it.
- Appropriated: the sentence says "there is appropriated", "is hereby appropriated" or "out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated"; or the amount is the one an appropriations paragraph ("For ..., $X") provides under an account heading of an appropriations act.
- Authorized: the sentence says "authorized to be appropriated". An authorization lets a later law provide the money. It provides none itself.
- A list under such a sentence ("there is appropriated the following: (1) ...; (2) ..."): an amount that begins an item is counted the same way as the sentence says, unless the sentence gives a total first. Then the items are parts of that total.
- "$X for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030" is counted as X times the number of years named (here 5). The yearly figure, the years and the product are all kept. "For each fiscal year" with no years named is counted once, and the answer says so.
- Open-ended: "such sums as may be necessary" names no amount. It is counted as an item and adds no dollars.
- Rescinded: "is hereby rescinded", "permanently cancelled", or an item of a list headed "the following funds are hereby rescinded". Shown apart. Not subtracted from the total.
- Not spending, and left out of the total: an amount after "not to exceed", "not more than", "up to", "less than", "in excess of" and like words; a fine or penalty; a limit the law raises ("the limitation is increased by $X"); a figure the law strikes from another law; and a figure inside words it writes into another law ("striking $X and inserting $Y"), unless the same sentence says the figure is authorized or appropriated.
- Counted once: an amount after "of which", after "Provided, That", or after "of the amounts made available" is a part of a total already counted. Where a paragraph ends "in all, $X", that total is counted and the amounts before it are its parts.
- An amount the rules cannot sort is "not classified". It is listed with its words and left out of the total. Nothing is guessed.
- Total dollars: appropriated dollars plus authorized dollars. The two are also shown apart.
What the law says it is for
Confirmed from the official recordThese are the law’s own words, and the words of Congress’s records, about what the law is for.
Official title
“To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of S. Con. Res. 33.”
The words under "An Act", Public Law 119-98, official text · Saved October 5, 2026 · Fingerprint 732dfc91a7aa4269
Short title
“Secure America Act”
The sentence that names the Act, Public Law 119-98, official text · Saved October 5, 2026 · Fingerprint 732dfc91a7aa4269
Congress's summary · Congressional Research Service
“Secure America Act This act provides $70 billion in funding to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) through FY2029 for immigration enforcement, border security, and related activities. It is known as a reconciliation bill and includes legislation submitted by certain congressional committees pursuant to provisions in the FY2026 congressional budget resolution ( S. Con. Res. 33 ) that directed the committees to submit legislation to the House or Senate Budget Committee that will increase the deficit. (Reconciliation bills are considered by Congress using expedited legislative procedures that prevent a filibuster and restrict amendments in the Senate.) TITLE I--COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS (Sec.”
The quote stops here. The source has the full text.
Summary of the version: Public Law, Congressional Research Service summary: Public Law · Saved October 6, 2026 · Fingerprint 243549ba8052eae8
The law has no findings or purpose section.
The bill's record names no committee report.
Dollars in this law
Confirmed from the official recordThese are the dollar amounts the text of this law states. Each one is sorted by the words printed around it.
- Total
- $69,545,000,000Appropriated plus authorized
- Appropriated
- $69,545,000,000Money the law itself provides
- Authorized
- $0Permission for a later law to provide money
- Rescinded, cancelled or reduced
- $0Shown apart. Not subtracted.
- Open-ended amounts
- 0Words such as “such sums as may be necessary”: no amount is named
The largest amounts
Each amount is shown with the words printed around it in the law.
- $31,075,000,000Appropriated
Title II, Section 202: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
“... , there is appropriated to the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for fiscal year 2026, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $31,075,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2029, for the following purposes: (1) Hiring, paying, a ...”
- $13,020,000,000Appropriated
Title II, Section 201: U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
“... le, there is appropriated to the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection for fiscal year 2026, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $13,020,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2029, for hiring, paying, training, and equipping U.S. Customs and ...”
- $9,550,000,000Appropriated
Title I, Section 101: U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION PERSONNEL
“... le, there is appropriated to the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection for fiscal year 2026, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $9,550,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2029, to hire, pay, train, and equip Border Patrol agents and Borde ...”
- $7,450,000,000Appropriated
Title I, Section 102: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
“... to the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for fiscal year 2026, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $7,450,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2029, to hire, pay, train, and equip Homeland Security Investigati ...”
- $3,450,000,000Appropriated
Title I, Section 103: BORDER SECURITY, TECHNOLOGY, AND SCREENING
“... of U.S. Customs and Border Protection for fiscal year 2026, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to remain available until September 30, 2029, $3,450,000,000 for the following: (1) Procurement and integration of new nonintrusive inspection equipm ...”
- $2,500,000,000Appropriated
Title I, Section 104: ADDITIONAL DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS
“... ts otherwise available, there are appropriated to the Secretary of Homeland Security for fiscal year 2026, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $2,500,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2029, for the purposes provided in this title.”
- $2,500,000,000Appropriated
Title II, Section 203: ADDITIONAL DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS
“... nts otherwise available, there is appropriated to the Secretary of Homeland Security for fiscal year 2026, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $2,500,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2029, for the purposes provided in this title or in paragraph (3) ...”
Sections with dollars
7 sections, the most dollars first
- Title II, Section 202: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT$31,075,000,000
- Title II, Section 201: U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION$13,020,000,000
- Title I, Section 101: U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION PERSONNEL$9,550,000,000
- Title I, Section 102: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT$7,450,000,000
- Title I, Section 103: BORDER SECURITY, TECHNOLOGY, AND SCREENING$3,450,000,000
- Title I, Section 104: ADDITIONAL DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS$2,500,000,000
- Title II, Section 203: ADDITIONAL DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS$2,500,000,000
Left out of the total
- 1 amount is a limit, a threshold or a penalty. It is not spending.
- 1 amount is a part of a total already counted. It is left out so that no dollar is counted twice.
Sentences with dollar figures in Congress’s summary
These sentences come from the summary of this law by the Congressional Research Service, a part of the Library of Congress.
“Secure America Act This act provides $70 billion in funding to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S.”
Source: Congressional Research Service summary: Public Law · Saved October 6, 2026 · Fingerprint 243549ba8052eae8
Source: Public Law 119-98, official text · Saved October 5, 2026 · Fingerprint 732dfc91a7aa4269
Other measures
Each measure has its own status. None is added into the score.
- Dollars in sections added along the way
- $31,075,000,000 of $69,545,000,000 (44.7%)Confirmed from the official record
Dollars read in sections of the final law marked "added later", divided by total dollars.
- Member-requested dollars as a share of appropriated dollars
- Not checked yet
No list of member-requested spending is printed in the 315 official records saved for this law, and no committee report says there is none.
- Open-ended amounts (“such sums as may be necessary”)
- 0 passagesConfirmed from the official record
- Other bills whose text this law contains
- 0 billsConfirmed from the official record
- How the House passed it
- Recorded vote: 214 Yes, 212 No, 0 Present, 4 Did not vote, June 9, 2026Confirmed from the official record
- How the Senate passed it
- Recorded vote: 52 Yes, 47 No, 0 Present, 1 Did not vote, June 5, 2026Confirmed from the official record
- Committee report saved
- None in the official recordConfirmed from the official record
The bill's official record names no committee report.
- Hearing saved
- None in the official recordConfirmed from the official record
The bill's official record names no hearing.
How these are counted
- Added along the way, sections: sections of the final law marked "added later", divided by the sections compared.
- Added along the way, words: words in those sections, divided by the words in the sections compared.
- Each text is read as a list of words. A run is 5 words in a row. For each section of the final law we count the share of its runs that appear anywhere in the first published text of the bill. 90 percent or more: in the first text. From 20 to 90 percent: changed. Under 20 percent: added later. A section with fewer than 20 words is not compared.
- Sections outside the stated intent: sections a person approved as outside the stated intent, divided by the sections read. The same count is given in words.
- Member-requested spending: the number of items in the lists Congress printed for the law, and the sum of their dollar amounts.
- A part that is not checked yet is shown as "Not checked yet". It is never counted as zero. No single blended number is given.
Added along the way
Confirmed from the official record1 of the 7 sections compared is added after the first published text of the bill. 2 are changed. 4 are in the first text. 2 headings and short sections are too short to compare.
A section counts as added later when under 20 percent of its wording appears in the first published text.
Congress published no introduced text of this bill. The comparison starts from the earliest text it published: Placed on Calendar Senate, May 20, 2026.
The first published text (Placed on Calendar Senate, May 20, 2026): S. 2, Placed on Calendar Senate · Saved October 7, 2026 · Fingerprint afc31f08b8ad31ca
Published texts of this bill, in order: Placed on Calendar Senate (May 20, 2026), Engrossed in Senate (June 5, 2026), Enrolled Bill.
Sections added later
1 section
- Title II, Section 202: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT696 words
Amendments adopted
1 adopted of 369 listed for this bill
- S.Amdt. 5453Replaces the whole text of the bill
Sponsor: Sen. Graham, Lindsey [R-SC]. The Senate adopted it on June 5, 2026, by voice vote.
In the nature of a substitute.
An adopted amendment in the nature of a substitute replaces the whole text of the bill. Its sponsor is named here. It is not tied to single sections.
Other bills whose text this law contains
The Congressional Research Service marks no other bill as one whose text this law contains.
Member-requested spending
No list foundNo list of member-requested spending is printed in the 315 official records saved for this law, and no committee report says there is none.
Sections outside the stated intent
Not checked yetA person reviews each reading before it appears here.
On the record
On the record: Not started.
Press releases by members of Congress
From a secondary sourceThese are press releases from members' official websites that name this law. We save a copy of each one.
“News item” marks an item the site publishes outside its press release pages.
34 press releases and 1 news item
-
Scalise's Summer Update: Key House Republican Wins of 2026
“S. 2 (Sen. Graham) – the Secure America Act: fully funds ICE and CBP through fiscal year 2029, guaranteeing these agencies have the necessary resources to carry out President Trump’s border agenda and ensuring congressional Democrats will no longer be able to stymie funding required to keep Americans safe.”
-
Malliotakis Joins ICE to Highlight Worst of Worst Arrests & Sound Alarm on Hochul Sanctuary Law
“The two highlighted the new federal funding included in S.2, the Secure America Act, a nearly $70 billion reconciliation package that ensures Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) operations continue uninterrupted by fully funding both agencies through September 30, 2029, covering the remainder of President Trump’s term.”
-
“WASHINGTON, DC — El Comisionado Residente y miembro del Comité de Seguridad Nacional, Pablo José Hernández, emitió hoy la siguiente declaración tras la aprobación de S. 2 – Secure America Act en la cámara de representantes.”
-
Congresswoman McCollum Votes No on Republican's Blank Check for ICE and CBP
“WASHINGTON, D.C. — On Tuesday, the House of Representatives passed a budget bill ( S.2 ) that provides another blank check for the Trump administration to continue to deploy ICE and Border Patrol agents across America without any oversight or accountability.”
-
Rep. Smucker Supports Reconciliation 2.0, The Secure America Act
“WASHINGTON – Representative Lloyd Smucker (PA-11), Vice Chairman of the House Budget Committee, voted in favor of the Secure America Act (S. 2), the budget reconciliation bill that provides $70 billion in funding over the next three years for U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).”
-
Congressman Rogers Helped Send Secure America Act to President Trump's Desk
“WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. Rep. Harold “Hal” Rogers (KY-05) helped send the Secure America Act, S.2, on to the President desk. Congressman Rogers voted for the reconciliation package to provide long-term funding for ICE and Border Patrol through September 2029.”
Show all 35
-
Newhouse Votes to Advance Critical Funding for Homeland Security
“WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Rep. Dan Newhouse (WA-04) released the following statement after voting in support of S. 2, the Secure America Act. This legislation passed the House with a vote of 214-212.”
-
Rep. McGuire celebrates the passage of the Secure America Act
“WASHINGTON, D.C. — Following the passage of S.2- Secure America Act, Rep. John McGuire issued the following statement.”
-
Congressman Mfume Statement on Republican Passage of ICE & CBP Funding via Reconciliation
“WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Kweisi Mfume (MD-07) issued the following statement regarding last night's passage of S.2 (also known as Reconciliation 2.0) in the House of Representatives:”
-
As ICE Remains Unchecked, Congresswoman Lizzie Fletcher Votes Against More Funding for ICE
“Today, Congresswoman Lizzie Fletcher (TX-07) voted against the disingenuously named Secure America Act (S.2) to provide the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) with $70 billion. Specifically, the legislation provides $38.5 billion for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), $26 billion for Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and $5 billion for DHS.”
-
Rep. Ciscomani Votes to Fund the Department of Homeland Security
“Washington, D.C. - U.S. Representative Juan Ciscomani voted in favor of S. 2 Secure America Act, which provides critical funding for key components of the Department of Homeland Security to strengthen border security and support Southeastern Arizona.”
-
Rep. Sykes Opposes Republican Reconciliation Bill Expanding ICE Enforcement Without Reforms
“WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Representative Emilia Sykes (OH-13) voted against S.2, the Secure America Act. The Republicans’ roughly $70 billion reconciliation package that funds Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) without commonsense reforms.”
-
“S.2 – Secure America Act passed the House of Representatives with a party line vote of 214-212. Kiley is the sole independent member of the House and currently represents California’s 3 rd Congressional district.”
-
Joyce Votes to Fully Fund the Department of Homeland Security
“WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Dave Joyce (OH-14) released the following statement after voting in favor of S.2, the Secure America Act. This bill secures funding for U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement through September 30, 2029.”
-
Congresswoman Escobar Statement on Republican Reconciliation 2.0
“Today, Congresswoman Veronica Escobar (TX-16) released the following statement after S.2, the FY2026 Budget Resolution (also known as Reconciliation 2.0) passed in the House:”
-
“WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, Congresswoman Lateefah Simon (D-CA-12) released the below statement after voting against S. 2, the Republican budget reconciliation bill. The Republican budget reconciliation bill would provide $70 billion for the Trump Administration’s Immigration, Customs, Enforcement (ICE) and Customs, Border, Patrol (CBP).”
-
Kelly votes to strengthen U.S. border security, fund CBP & ICE
“WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Today, U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA) voted in favor S.2, Secure America Act, legislation that would provide a $70 billion package to fund immigration enforcement agencies, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), through 2029.”
-
On the House Floor: Fedorchak urges support for Secure America Act
“Washington D.C. — Congresswoman Julie Fedorchak (R-ND) spoke on the House Floor today in support of S. 2, the Secure America Act, legislation to fully fund the Department of Homeland Security’s border and immigration enforcement agencies through fiscal year 2029.”
-
Barrett Helps Pass Funding For Customs And Border Security
“Washington, D.C. — Tonight, Congressman Tom Barrett (MI-07) voted for the Secure America Act (S.2) to provide funding for Customs and Border Protection (CBP), which passed the House by a vote of 214-212. This is the fourth time since February that Barrett has voted to fund efforts to secure the border and combat the smuggling of deadly fentanyl into America.”
-
Amo Slams Republican Scheme to Fund Trump’s Masked ICE Agents While Families Face Rising Costs
“Congressman Amo, a Member of the House Budget Committee, introduced 2 amendments to stop some of the worst Republican excesses of S. 2, the Secure America Act.”
-
Wagner Votes to Fund Law Enforcement, Keep Border Secure
“Washington, D.C. – Congresswoman Ann Wagner (R-MO) released the following statement after she voted in support of S. 2, the Secure America Act:”
-
Webster Votes to Pass the Secure America Act
“Washington, D.C. — Florida Congressman Daniel Webster, R-Clermont, today voted to pass S. 2, the Secure America Act, legislation that provides long-term funding for border security personnel, immigration enforcement operations, drug trafficking efforts, and programs to combat child exploitation.”
-
Congresswoman Luz Rivas Votes Against Republicans’ Unprecedented Bill to Fund ICE
“WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congresswoman Luz Rivas (CA-29) voted “NO” on S.2 – Republicans’ spending bill that provides an additional $70 billion to fund the Trump Administration’s cruel and inhumane Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) while failing to address the rising cost of living for working families.”
-
Raskin Statement on MAGA’s Latest Billion-Dollar ICE Handout
“Washington, D.C.— Today, Representative Jamie Raskin (MD-08) released the following statement after House Republicans sent S. 2 to President Trump’s desk. The legislation provides $70 billion taxpayer dollars for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (Border Patrol), while failing to guard against President Trump’s $1.8 billion slush fund and Super Pardon:”
-
Palmer Votes in Favor of Funding ICE, CBP
“WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Representative Gary Palmer (AL-06) voted in favor of S. 2, the Secure America Act. Following the passage of this legislation, Rep. Palmer released the following statement:”
-
Rep. Troy E. Nehls Votes to Send Second Reconciliation Package to President Trump’s Desk
“WASHINGTON, D.C. — Congressman Troy E. Nehls (R-TX-22) released the following statement after voting “YES” to pass S.2, the Secure America Act, which would provide robust funding for federal law enforcement, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and support the Trump Administration’s efforts to secure our nation’s borders:”
-
Rep. Loudermilk on Passage of Secure America Act
“Washington, D.C. (June 9, 2026) | Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) issued the following statement following the U.S. House vote on S.2 –the Secure America Act.”
-
Knott Votes to Restore ICE and CBP Funding After 100 Days of Democrat Obstruction
“WASHINGTON- Congressman Brad Knott (NC-13) issued the following statement after the House passed S. 2, the Secure America Act, a reconciliation bill that restores critical funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP).”
-
Harris Applauds Passage of Secure America Act to Fully Fund ICE and CBP
“WASHINGTON, DC — Congressman Mark Harris (NC-08) released the following statement after the House of Representatives passed S. 2, the Secure America Act, which provides historic, multi-year funding for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) through Fiscal Year 2029. The bill now heads to President Trump’s desk.”
-
Rep. Fitzgerald Votes to Pass the Secure America Act to Fully Fund ICE and CBP
“WASHINGTON, DC – Congressman Scott Fitzgerald (WI-05) issued the following statement after voting to pass S. 2, the Secure America Act.”
-
Rep. Crank Votes to Fully Fund ICE and Border Patrol
“WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Today, Representative Jeff Crank (CO-05) voted in favor of S. 2, the Secure America Act, to fully fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP).”
-
Brown Votes Against Reckless Republican Budget Giving Billions to ICE
“Washington, DC – Today, House Republicans passed a Budget Reconciliation bill (S.2) that funnels over $60 billion dollars into the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) slush funds. Despite the fact that these agencies are currently holding over $100 billion in additional extra funds, the equivalent of years’ worth of their normal budget.”
-
Congressman Aderholt’s Statement on House Passage of the Secure America Act
“WASHINGTON, D.C. — Congressman Robert Aderholt (AL-04) released the following statement after the House of Representatives passed S. 2, the Secure America Act.”
-
House Republicans Send ICE and CBP Funding to President Trump's Desk
“Today, the House of Representatives passed S. 2, the Secure America Act, which fully funds Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) through Fiscal Year 2029. After voting in support of the measure, Congressman Rick W. Allen (GA-12) released the following statement:”
-
“Today, Congresswoman Veronica Escobar (TX-16) provided testimony during the House Rules Committee hearing on S.2, the FY2026 Budget Resolution (also known as Reconciliation 2.0). This legislation passed in the Senate last week and is to be considered in the House this week.”
Read from 539 of 539 members' sites, releases since January 3, 2025, through October 7, 2026.
Press releases by organizations
No saved press release from these organizations names this law.
Read from 510 of 510 organizations' sites, releases since January 3, 2025, through October 7, 2026.
What it touches
Kind of law: Budget law. Budget effect: Sets agency funding.
Government
- Budgets and expenditures
- Justice and enforcement
- Emergencies, defense and external affairs
- Organization and workforce
- Technology, algorithms and surveillance
The economy
- Federal spending
Daily life
- Immigration
- Safety and policing
Agencies it funds or directs
Dollar amounts:Not checked yetHow it passed
The Senate passed it 52 to 47 on June 5, 2026, with 1 senator who did not vote.
The House passed it 214 to 212 on June 9, 2026, with 4 members who did not vote.
The question on the official record: House, “On Passage”. Senate, “On Passage of the Bill (S. 2, As Amended)”.
| Chamber and party | Yes | No | Present | Did not vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| House Republicans | 214 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| House Democrats | 0 | 211 | 0 | 1 |
| House independents | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Senate Republicans | 52 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Senate Democrats | 0 | 44 | 0 | 1 |
| Senate independents | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
How each member votes
Pick a state to see how its members vote on this law, or show all states. Enter a ZIP code to see your own officials first.
Corrections to this page
- Account and topic tags. Tagged “Sets agency funding”. The law lists seven funding amounts for the Department of Homeland Security and no tax provisions. The account now says what the money is for. Corrected October 5, 2026 · Titles I and II, read in full
Lobbying reports that name this bill
Confirmed from the official record52 saved lobbying reports name S. 2. The amount is what the report gives for the whole quarter: everything the registrant did for that client, all issues together. A linked name opens that organization’s page on this site.
| Registrant | Client | Amount for the whole quarter | Quarter | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LONGBOW PUBLIC POLICY GROUP, LLC | FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ASSOCIATION | $40,000.00reported as income | April to June 2026 | Open the report |
| ECONOMIC SECURITY PROJECT ACTION, INC. AND ITS AFFILIATES | ECONOMIC SECURITY PROJECT ACTION, INC. AND ITS AFFILIATES | $150,000.00reported as expenses | April to June 2026 | Open the report |
| FWD.US | FWD.US | $250,000.00reported as expenses | April to June 2026 | Open the report |
See the 52 listed reports that name S. 2
Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
Lobbying Disclosure Act reports, LDA.gov. This copy was read October 7, 2026 at 3:34 PM Eastern.
Where this comes from
We saved our own copy of each official vote file listed here before writing this page. A code beside a file is its fingerprint, a short code that changes if the file's contents change.