Epstein Files Transparency Act
Requires the Justice Department to publish its unclassified records on Jeffrey Epstein in a searchable form within 30 days.
What this law changes
From a secondary sourceRequires the Justice Department to publish its unclassified records on Jeffrey Epstein in a searchable form within 30 days.
This account is written from the official description of the bill. We have saved the law's official text and have not finished checking the account against it.
Transparency Score
The Transparency Score is the share of this law’s dollars that goes to what the law says it is for.
Transparency Score
Share of the text within the stated purpose:Not checked yetThe text of this law provides and authorizes no dollar amount. The score is the share of its text within the stated intent. That share is "Not checked yet": no reading of this law is approved by a person yet.
How this is counted
- Transparency Score: dollars in sections a person approved as within the stated intent, divided by total dollars in the law. Shown as a percentage. Higher means more of the money goes to what the law says it is for.
- Beside it, the same two numbers the other way round: total dollars divided by dollars within the stated intent. 1.00 means every dollar is within the stated intent. When no dollar is within the stated intent this ratio cannot be computed, and the answer says so.
- Total dollars: appropriated dollars plus authorized dollars, read from the law's text by the rules below. Dollars in a section whose reading is unclear or was not read count in the total and are shown apart as unclear.
- A law whose text provides and authorizes no dollar amount reads "No money in this law". Its score is the share of its words that are in sections within the stated intent.
- The score reads "Not checked yet" until a person approves the law's reading of which sections are within the stated intent. The dollar totals need no reading and are shown before that.
- The dollar totals read "Not checked yet" when more than 10 percent of the dollars read could not be sorted by the rules.
- Every dollar amount in our saved text of the law is read: "$1,234,567", "$5 billion", "$2.5 million". Margin notes, page marks and the table of contents are left out. Each amount is kept with the words printed around it.
- Appropriated: the sentence says "there is appropriated", "is hereby appropriated" or "out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated"; or the amount is the one an appropriations paragraph ("For ..., $X") provides under an account heading of an appropriations act.
- Authorized: the sentence says "authorized to be appropriated". An authorization lets a later law provide the money. It provides none itself.
- A list under such a sentence ("there is appropriated the following: (1) ...; (2) ..."): an amount that begins an item is counted the same way as the sentence says, unless the sentence gives a total first. Then the items are parts of that total.
- "$X for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030" is counted as X times the number of years named (here 5). The yearly figure, the years and the product are all kept. "For each fiscal year" with no years named is counted once, and the answer says so.
- Open-ended: "such sums as may be necessary" names no amount. It is counted as an item and adds no dollars.
- Rescinded: "is hereby rescinded", "permanently cancelled", or an item of a list headed "the following funds are hereby rescinded". Shown apart. Not subtracted from the total.
- Not spending, and left out of the total: an amount after "not to exceed", "not more than", "up to", "less than", "in excess of" and like words; a fine or penalty; a limit the law raises ("the limitation is increased by $X"); a figure the law strikes from another law; and a figure inside words it writes into another law ("striking $X and inserting $Y"), unless the same sentence says the figure is authorized or appropriated.
- Counted once: an amount after "of which", after "Provided, That", or after "of the amounts made available" is a part of a total already counted. Where a paragraph ends "in all, $X", that total is counted and the amounts before it are its parts.
- An amount the rules cannot sort is "not classified". It is listed with its words and left out of the total. Nothing is guessed.
- Total dollars: appropriated dollars plus authorized dollars. The two are also shown apart.
What the law says it is for
Confirmed from the official recordThese are the law’s own words, and the words of Congress’s records, about what the law is for.
Official title
“To require the Attorney General to release all documents and records in possession of the Department of Justice relating to Jeffrey Epstein, and for other purposes.”
The words under "An Act", Public Law 119-38, official text · Saved October 5, 2026 · Fingerprint 5a706af3db510f49
Short title
“Epstein Files Transparency Act”
The sentence that names the Act, Public Law 119-38, official text · Saved October 5, 2026 · Fingerprint 5a706af3db510f49
Congress's summary · Congressional Research Service
“Epstein Files Transparency Act This act requires the Department of Justice (DOJ) to publish (in a searchable and downloadable format) all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials in DOJ's possession that relate to the investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. This includes (1) materials that relate to Ghislaine Maxwell, (2) flight logs and travel records, and (3) individuals named or referenced (including government officials) in connection with the investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. DOJ is permitted to withhold certain information such as the personal information of victims and materials that would jeopardize an active federal investigation.”
The quote stops here. The source has the full text.
Summary of the version: Public Law, Congressional Research Service summary: Public Law · Saved October 6, 2026 · Fingerprint df6440ca1f93f69a
The law has no findings or purpose section.
The bill's record names no committee report.
Dollars in this law
Confirmed from the official recordThe text of this law provides and authorizes no dollar amount.
Source: Public Law 119-38, official text · Saved October 5, 2026 · Fingerprint 5a706af3db510f49
Other measures
Each measure has its own status. None is added into the score.
- Dollars in sections added along the way
- No money in this law
- Member-requested dollars as a share of appropriated dollars
- Not checked yet
No list of member-requested spending is printed in the 26 official records saved for this law, and no committee report says there is none.
- Open-ended amounts (“such sums as may be necessary”)
- 0 passagesConfirmed from the official record
- Other bills whose text this law contains
- 0 billsConfirmed from the official record
- How the House passed it
- Recorded vote: 427 Yes, 1 No, 0 Present, 5 Did not vote, November 18, 2025Confirmed from the official record
- How the Senate passed it
- Unanimous consent, November 19, 2025Confirmed from the official record
- Committee report saved
- None in the official recordConfirmed from the official record
The bill's official record names no committee report.
- Hearing saved
- None in the official recordConfirmed from the official record
The bill's official record names no hearing.
A voice vote or unanimous consent leaves no record of how each member voted.
How these are counted
- Added along the way, sections: sections of the final law marked "added later", divided by the sections compared.
- Added along the way, words: words in those sections, divided by the words in the sections compared.
- Each text is read as a list of words. A run is 5 words in a row. For each section of the final law we count the share of its runs that appear anywhere in the first published text of the bill. 90 percent or more: in the first text. From 20 to 90 percent: changed. Under 20 percent: added later. A section with fewer than 20 words is not compared.
- Sections outside the stated intent: sections a person approved as outside the stated intent, divided by the sections read. The same count is given in words.
- Member-requested spending: the number of items in the lists Congress printed for the law, and the sum of their dollar amounts.
- A part that is not checked yet is shown as "Not checked yet". It is never counted as zero. No single blended number is given.
Time to read before the House vote
How long the text is public before the House votes on it. This measure is not added into the score.
- House
- 20 hours 11 minutesConfirmed from the official record
The House Clerk posted the text on November 17, 2025 at 6:32 p.m. Eastern. The House voted on November 18, 2025 at 2:43 p.m. Eastern.
8 pages: H.R. 4405, Engrossed in House. The page count GovInfo gives for this text. The copy posted for the floor can be laid out on a different number of pages.
The vote: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by recorded vote (2/3 required): 427 - 1 (Roll no. 289). (text: CR H4725)
Posted: House Clerk, bills to be considered, week of 2025-11-17 · Saved October 8, 2026 · Fingerprint 498feb78ba3a4a11
Voted: Actions on H.R. 4405, Congress's data service · Saved October 8, 2026 · Fingerprint 57ec9709c3b820ba
Pages: GovInfo's record of BILLS-119hr4405eh · Saved October 8, 2026 · Fingerprint 31dd89d1bd3ce24e
How the time zone is checked
- The action's time read as Eastern time is the same moment as the recorded vote's own time in UTC.
- The file's own update stamp read as Eastern time is the same moment as the Last-Modified time (GMT) the file was served with.
- Senate
- Not published yet
The Senate publishes no time stamp for when the text of a bill is posted, so no time to read is given for the Senate.
How this is counted
- Posted: the moment the last file of the floor item became public on the House Clerk's weekly list of bills, before the vote. A file is public from the first time the list was published at or after the moment the file was added.
- A floor item lists the bill text and can list papers that go with it, such as an explanatory statement. The list does not say which file is which. So the count runs from the last file made public before the vote, and the moment the item was first listed is shown beside it. The count is never longer than the real time to read.
- Voted: the time of the House floor action in Congress's data service. When the House voted on the bill more than once, the last vote is used: that is the vote on the text that went on to become law.
- Time to read: voted minus posted, in hours and minutes. Both are Eastern time.
- Pages: the page count GovInfo gives for the text of the bill as the House voted on it. The copy posted for the floor can be laid out on a different number of pages.
- Which floor item: the one that names the bill. When several name it, the one whose words name the same kind of vote. When the House voted on the bill more than once that week and the list does not tell the votes apart, no figure is given.
- A floor item taken off the list, two floor items that fit, a text made public only after the vote, or a time zone check that shows another time zone: the figure reads "Not checked yet".
Congressional Budget Office cost estimates
Congress’s data service lists no Congressional Budget Office cost estimate for the bill behind this law.
H.R. 4405, Congress's data service · Saved October 8, 2026 · Fingerprint fa67494f7785aeb4
Added along the way
Confirmed from the official record0 of the 2 sections compared are added after the first published text of the bill. None is changed. 2 are in the first text. 1 heading or short section is too short to compare.
A section counts as added later when under 20 percent of its wording appears in the first published text.
The first published text (Introduced in House, July 15, 2025): H.R. 4405, Introduced in House · Saved October 7, 2026 · Fingerprint 6cbabf22ea05eb7c
Published texts of this bill, in order: Introduced in House (July 15, 2025), Engrossed in House (November 18, 2025), Received in Senate (November 19, 2025), Enrolled Bill.
Sections added later
No section compared is added later.
Amendments adopted
The record lists no adopted amendment to this bill.
Other bills whose text this law contains
The Congressional Research Service marks no other bill as one whose text this law contains.
Member-requested spending
No list foundNo list of member-requested spending is printed in the 26 official records saved for this law, and no committee report says there is none.
Sections outside the stated intent
Not checked yetA person reviews each reading before it appears here.
What this law changes in taxes
This law changes no tax.
Our reader went through the full text. It found no sentence that amends the Internal Revenue Code, the Harmonized Tariff Schedule or the Tariff Act of 1930, and no sentence that names a tax, a tariff or the Internal Revenue Service.
How we read a law for this section
- A provision is one sentence of the law that says a part of a tax law "is amended" or "is repealed". The words are quoted from our saved copy of the law. Words inside text the law inserts into another law are not read as provisions.
- A sentence counts when it names the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or title 26 of the United States Code; when it says "such Code" and the last Code named in that section of the law is the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; when the law says that its amendments are to be read as amendments to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and the sentence names no other law; or when the sentence names no law at all and the amending sentence before it, in the same section of the law, amended the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
- A sentence that amends the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States or the Tariff Act of 1930 is listed under "Tariffs and customs duties".
- The tax type comes from the number of the Code section the sentence names. Sections 1 to 5, 21 to 26, 32, 35, 36, 36B, 62, 63, 67, 68, 151 to 153 and 211 to 224 apply to individuals: "Individual income tax". Sections 11, 12, 59A, 241 to 250, 301 to 385, 531 to 565 and 1501 to 1564 apply to corporations: "Corporate income tax". Every other section from 1 to 1400Z and 1411 to 1564 is "Income tax, individuals and businesses". Sections 1401 to 1403 and 3101 to 3512: "Payroll taxes". Sections 2001 to 2801: "Estate and gift taxes". Sections 4001 to 5891: "Excise taxes". Every other section, such as the rules on returns, penalties and trust funds: "Other tax law".
- A sentence that names a chapter or subtitle of the Code and no section is sorted by that chapter or subtitle. A sentence that adds a new section is sorted by the new section's number.
- "Old and new" is shown only where the law says both: "striking X and inserting Y". Other dollar amounts and percentages in the sentence are listed as printed.
- A change to a table of contents or a change headed "Conforming" or "Clerical" is listed apart.
- A law reads "This law changes no tax" only when our saved copy reaches the end of the law, no sentence above is found, the text does not name the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Internal Revenue Service, the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, a tariff, a duty or a named tax, and the margin of the official print cites title 26 of the United States Code nowhere.
- Nothing here says how much tax anyone pays. That takes figures the law's text does not state.
Read from: Public Law 119-38, official text · Saved October 5, 2026 · Fingerprint 5a706af3db510f49
On the record
On the record: Not started.
Press releases by members of Congress
From a secondary sourceThese are press releases from members' official websites that name this law. We save a copy of each one.
44 press releases
-
Khanna, Massie, Leger Fernández, Merkley, Luján Introduce the "Epstein Files Transparency Act II"
“This bill gives standing to state attorneys general, the victims of Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators, and members of Congress to challenge the Department of Justice (DOJ) in court for the DOJ's failure to comply with the disclosure of materials required by Public Law 119-38, the Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA). Teresa Leger Fernández (D-NM), Chair of the Democratic Women's”
-
Massie, Khanna, Leger Fernández, Merkley, Luján Introduce the "Epstein Files Transparency Act II"
“This bill gives standing to state attorneys general, the victims of Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators, and members of Congress to challenge the Department of Justice (DOJ) in court for the DOJ's failure to comply with the disclosure of materials required by Public Law 119-38, the Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA). Reps. Ro Khanna (D-CA) and Teresa Leger Fernández (D-NM),”
-
“H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires the Attorney General to release all documents and records possessed by the Department of Justice relating to Jeffrey Epstein to increase public accountability in federal investigations connected to Epstein;”
-
“The memorandum, originally addressed to former U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman, was released by the Department of Justice under the Epstein Files Transparency Act (Public Law 119–38). Despite this federal mandate for transparency, the document remains heavily redacted and appears to conceal the identities of wealthy and powerful individuals who conspired in Epstein's sex trafficking operations.”
-
Rep. Nancy Mace Demands DOJ Explain Why Epstein Files Were Removed From Public Website
“The letter comes after numerous documents which were initially released to the public under the Epstein Files Transparency Act (Public Law 119-38) were subsequently removed from the DOJ's website. Public reporting indicates some documents were removed due to improper redactions which exposed victims' identities and sexually explicit photographs, while other documents appear to have been removed and never restored.”
-
BOEBERT BULLETIN: DECEMBER 1, 2025
“H.R. 4405 - Epstein Files Transparency Act - YES (Passed)”
Show all 44
-
“We write jointly as Members of the United States House of Representatives who sponsored the Epstein Files Transparency Act, Public Law 119-38 and as amici curiae in the above-caption manner. We respectfully request permission to file this brief as amici curiae given our unique expertise as the leads of the Epstein Files Transparency Act.”
-
Congresswoman McCollum Votes to Release Epstein Files
“WASHINGTON, D.C. — On Tuesday afternoon, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act, by a vote of 427-1. Congresswoman McCollum voted in favor of the measure.”
-
Congressman Bentz's Statement on the Release of the Epstein Files
“Washington, D.C. – Congressman Cliff Bentz (R-OR) voted YES on H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act. This bill will require that the Attorney General release, to the public, all documents and records in the possession of the Department of Justice relating to Jeffery Epstein.”
-
“Following the bipartisan passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R. 4405) by the U.S. House of Representatives, Sen. Ossoff and a group of Senate colleagues are urging Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) to immediately bring the bill up for a vote.”
-
“The U.S. Senate has the chance to show strong leadership and swiftly pass this legislation,” concluded the senators. “ We urge you to promptly proceed to the consideration of H.R. 4405 on the Senate floor pursuant to Senate Rule XIV, so that the legislation can be immediately placed on the Senate Calendar.”
-
Rep. Pfluger Votes to Release Epstein Files
“WASHINGTON, DC — Today, Congressman August Pfluger (TX-11) voted to pass H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Following the vote, Rep. Pfluger released the statement below:”
-
“Washington, DC — U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) released the following statement after the House of Representatives voted to pass H.R. 4405, The Epstein Files Transparency Act,:”
-
Hoyer Statement After Voting to Release the Epstein Files
“WASHINGTON, DC – Congressman Steny H. Hoyer (MD-05) released the following statement today after voting on H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act:”
-
Barrett Votes To Release Epstein Files, Stands With Survivors Demanding Justice
“Washington, D.C. — Today, Congressman Tom Barrett (MI-07) voted YES on the Epstein Files Transparency Act ( H.R. 4405 ), which passed the U.S. House of Representatives by a vote of 427-1. This legislation would require the Department of Justice (DOJ) to publish all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials related to the investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein,”
-
Fedorchak votes for transparency and justice for Epstein victims
“Washington, D.C. — Congresswoman Julie Fedorchak (R-ND) today voted in favor of H.R. 4405, legislation requiring the public release of all unclassified federal records related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.”
-
Yakym Votes to Release the Epstein Files
“WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Congressman Rudy Yakym (IN-02) issued the following statement after voting in favor of the Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R. 4405), legislation that would release the Epstein files.”
-
Smith Releases Statement After Voting to Release the Epstein Files
“Washington, D.C. – Today, Congressman Adrian Smith released the following statement after voting for H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act:”
-
Rep. Pettersen Statement on Vote to Release Epstein Files
“Today, U.S. Representative Brittany Pettersen (CO-07) released the following statement after voting on legislation – H.R. 4405 – to require the Department of Justice (DOJ) to publish documents related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. The bill advanced despite months of opposition from the Trump administration who went to extreme lengths to try and quell efforts to release the files.”
-
Congressman Flood Votes for the Epstein Files Transparency Act
“WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Congressman Mike Flood issued a statement following his vote for H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act.”
-
Congresswoman Brown Votes to Force Trump to Release the Epstein Files
“The Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R. 4405) requires the Department of Justice to publish, in a searchable format, all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials in DOJ’s possession related to the investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. The legislation includes measures to protect the privacy of survivors and ensure their personal information is redacted.”
-
Congressman Taylor Votes to Release Epstein Files
“WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Dave Taylor (OH-02) today voted in support of releasing the entirety of the Epstein files through H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act. This bill passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 427-1.”
-
SCHNEIDER VOTES TO RELEASE ALL EPSTEIN FILES
“WASHINGTON - Rep. Brad Schneider (IL-10) released the following statement in support of H.R. 4405”
-
Smucker Votes to Release Epstein Files
“WASHINGTON – Today, Rep. Lloyd Smucker (PA-11) voted in favor of H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The House of Representatives passed the bill, which would require the Department of Justice (DOJ) to release its files on Jeffrey Epstein, with overwhelming, nearly unanimous support.”
-
Congressman Rogers Votes to Release the Epstein Files
“WASHINGTON, DC – In a nearly unanimous vote, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R. 4405) by a vote of 427-1, requiring the U.S. Department of Justice to release all documents and records relating to Jeffrey Epstein. Congressman Rogers voted in support of the bill, as well as the House Resolution that passed in September,”
-
Congressman Tim Moore Votes to Release the Epstein Files
“WASHINGTON, D.C. — Congressman Tim Moore (NC-14) issued the following statement after voting in support of H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act:”
-
Congressman Moore Votes to Release Epstein Files, Advancing Radical Transparency
“Washington, D.C. – Congressman Riley M. Moore voted for radical transparency, joining his colleagues in passing H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires the release of all investigative files related to Jeffrey Epstein, marking an official step towards accountability, transparency, and justice for victims.”
-
Congressman Max Miller’s Statement on Vote to Release Epstein Files
“WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Congressman Max Miller (OH-07) released the following statement after the passage of H.R.4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act.”
-
Latta Votes to Release the Epstein Files
“WASHINGTON, DC—Today, Congressman Bob Latta (OH-5), voted in favor of H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act, a bill that would require the Department of Justice (DOJ) to publish all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials in DOJ’s possession that relate to the investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein.”
-
Golden votes to release Epstein files
“WASHINGTON — Congressman Jared Golden (ME-02) voted today for H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which would require the Department of Justice to publicly release all unclassified materials from its investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. The bill passed the House by a vote of 427-1.”
-
Congressman Gabe Evans Votes to Release the Epstein Files
“WASHINGTON, DC — Today Representative Gabe Evans joined a bipartisan group of members who voted in favor of H.R. 4405; The Epstein Files Transparency Act, legislation that requires the Department of Justice to publicly disclose all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials related to Jeffrey Epstein.”
-
Fitzpatrick Statement Regarding the Jeffrey Epstein Investigation
“This was the case with H.Res. 668 in September, this was the case with H.R. 4405 today, and this will continue to be the case with any and all similar transparency and disclosure legislation in the future.”
-
Rep. Balint Votes to Release the Epstein Files
“WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Rep. Becca Balint (VT-AL) released the following statement after voting YES on H.R. 4405 to release the Epstein files:”
-
Congressman Biggs Issues Statement on House’s Passage of Epstein Transparency Legislation
“Today, Congressman Andy Biggs (R-AZ) voted in favor of H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which ultimately passed the House. Congressman Biggs issued the following statement:”
-
Rep. Adams Votes to Release Epstein Files
“WASHINGTON, DC— Today, Congresswoman Alma S. Adams, Ph.D. (NC-12) released a statement on her vote for H.R.4405, the “Epstein Files Transparency Act”, which requires the Department of Justice to publish all unclassified materials related to the investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein.”
-
Congressman Rouzer Votes to Release Epstein Files
“WASHINGTON, DC - Today, Congressman David Rouzer (NC-07) issued the following statement after voting to pass H.R. 4405 – the Epstein Files Transparency Act, requiring the Department of Justice (DOJ) to publicly disclose all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials in its possession relating to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.”
-
Murphy Votes to Release Epstein Files
“Washington, D.C. — Congressman Greg Murphy, M.D., issued the following statement after voting in favor of H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act.”
-
Dr. Joyce's Statement on House Vote to Release the Epstein Files
“Washington, D.C. – Today, Congressman John Joyce, M.D. (PA-13) released the following statement after voting to support H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act:”
-
“WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Congresswoman Jahana Hayes (CT-05) issued the following statement after the vote on H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act:”
-
Rep. Cline Supports Bill to Release Epstein Files
“Today, Congressman Ben Cline (VA-06) voted in support of H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which would require the production and release of all documents from Epstein-related investigations and prosecutions, flight logs and travel records, records of government officials connected to Epstein, records of entities with ties to Epstein, and all related communications.”
-
“WASHINGTON- Today, Congressman Michael Baumgartner (WA-05) issued the following statement upon the passage of H.R. 4405, The Epstein Files Transparency Act.”
-
Tiffany Statement on Vote to Release the Epstein Files
“WASHINGTON, DC - Congressman Tom Tiffany (WI-07) issued the following statement after voting for H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which passed the House with bipartisan support.”
-
Finstad Votes for Transparency on Epstein Files - United States Congressman Brad Finstad
“WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, Congressman Brad Finstad (MN-01) released the following statement after voting yes on H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act, legislation that would require Attorney General Pam Bondi to release all documents and records in the Department of Justice’s possession related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein:”
-
Fulcher Votes to Release Epstein Files - U.S. Congressman Russ Fulcher
“WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Congressman Russ Fulcher (Idaho-01) issued the following statement after the House passage of H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act:”
Read from 539 of 539 members' sites, releases since January 3, 2025, through October 8, 2026.
Press releases by organizations
No saved press release from these organizations names this law.
Read from 510 of 510 organizations' sites, releases since January 3, 2025, through October 8, 2026.
What it touches
Kind of law: New or changed rules. Budget effect: No direct effect on agency budgets.
Government
- Records, communications and archives
- Justice and enforcement
The economy
- No direct economic effect
Daily life
- Courts and legal rights
Agencies it funds or directs
Dollar amounts:Not checked yetHow it passed
The House passed it 427 to 1 on November 18, 2025, with 5 members who did not vote.
The Senate passed it without objection on November 19, 2025. No individual votes are recorded.
The question on the official record: House, “On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass”.
| Chamber and party | Yes | No | Present | Did not vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| House Republicans | 216 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| House Democrats | 211 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
How each member votes
The Senate passed this law without objection, so only House members have a recorded vote.
Pick a state to see how its members vote on this law, or show all states. Enter a ZIP code to see your own officials first.
Where this comes from
We saved our own copy of each official vote file listed here before writing this page. A code beside a file is its fingerprint, a short code that changes if the file's contents change.