Improving Law Enforcement Officer Safety and Wellness Through Data Act
Sponsored by Tim Moore RRepublican, introduced . Policy area, as Congress files it: Crime and Law Enforcement.
Status is read from the official actions by their Library of Congress codes: Became Public Law (36000) or a law number on the bill reads "Became law"; Vetoed (31000) reads "Vetoed"; Presented to President (28000) reads "Sent to the President"; passed or agreed to in the House (8000) and in the Senate (17000) reads "Passed both chambers"; one of them alone reads "Passed the House" or "Passed the Senate" ("Agreed to" for a resolution); reported to the House (5000) or the Senate (14000) reads "Reported by committee"; anything else reads "Introduced".
Source: Congress.gov data service (Library of Congress). Text versions: our copies of govinfo.gov’s files. Our copy was saved October 15, 2026.
Cosponsors
22 cosponsors.
| Member | Joined |
|---|---|
| Henry Cuellar DDemocratOriginal cosponsor | |
| Randy K. Weber, Sr. RRepublicanOriginal cosponsor | |
| Thomas R. Suozzi DDemocratOriginal cosponsor | |
| Byron Donalds RRepublicanOriginal cosponsor | |
| Zachary Nunn RRepublicanOriginal cosponsor | |
| Chuck Edwards RRepublicanOriginal cosponsor | |
| Virginia Foxx RRepublicanOriginal cosponsor | |
| Brian K. Fitzpatrick RRepublicanOriginal cosponsor | |
| Mark Harris RRepublicanOriginal cosponsor | |
| Jennifer A. Kiggans RRepublicanOriginal cosponsor | |
| Nicole Malliotakis RRepublicanOriginal cosponsor | |
| Stephanie I. Bice RRepublicanOriginal cosponsor | |
| Gus M. Bilirakis RRepublican | |
| Donald G. Davis DDemocrat | |
| Gabe Evans RRepublican | |
| John H. Rutherford RRepublican | |
| Marie Gluesenkamp Perez DDemocrat | |
| David Rouzer RRepublican | |
| Max L. Miller RRepublican | |
| Scott Franklin RRepublican | |
| Nicholas J. Begich III RRepublican | |
| Richard McCormick RRepublican |
Text
| Version | Date | Our copy |
|---|---|---|
| Referred in Senate | Not checked yetThe official file | |
| Engrossed in House | Not checked yetThe official file | |
| Reported in House | Not checked yetThe official file | |
| Introduced in House | Not checked yetThe official file |
Actions
- Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 403 - 11 (Roll no. 131). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H2071-2072)
- Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 403 - 11 (Roll no. 131). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H2071-2072)
- Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2078-2079)
- POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 2240, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mrs. McBath demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 2240.
- Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2240, H.R. 2243 and H.R. 2255. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2240, H.R. 2243, and H.R. 2255. All bills are being considered under a closed rule with each bill having one motion to recommit.
- Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 405. (consideration: CR H2071-2077)
- Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 405 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2240, H.R. 2243 and H.R. 2255. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2240, H.R. 2243, and H.R. 2255. All bills are being considered under a closed rule with each bill having one motion to recommit.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 56.
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-79.
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-79.
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Introduced in House
- Introduced in House
Committees
- Judiciary Committee (Senate)Referred To, May 19, 2025
- Judiciary Committee (House)Reported By, April 28, 2025; Markup By, March 25, 2025; Referred To, March 21, 2025
Hearings
We hold hearing records only for bills that became law.
Who lobbied on this bill
Confirmed from the official record1 lobbying report name H.R. 2240, for 1 client.
| Client | Registrant | Amount for the whole quarter | Lobbyists named for this issue | Filed | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTERNATIONAL UNION OF POLICE ASSOCIATIONS AFL-CIO | INTERNATIONAL UNION OF POLICE ASSOCIATIONS, AFL-CIOSecond quarter of 2026 | $20,000reported as expenses |
| Open the report |
A lobbying report states the registrant's income from the client (a lobbying firm) or its own lobbying expenses (an organization lobbying for itself), for the whole quarter and every issue together, rounded to the nearest $10,000. A report under $5,000 states no figure. It is not the amount spent on one bill.
Reports read: 0 of 1 quarters read in full (2026-Q2). With no registered key the service allows 15 requests a minute, so this covers the latest quarter only. With a key it covers four.
Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
All saved lobbying reports that name H.R. 2240
Contributions from these lobbyists and firms to the sponsor and cosponsors
No contribution report we hold ties a lobbyist or firm on these reports to the sponsor or a cosponsor.
Contribution reports are read for 2 of the 23 sponsors and cosponsors so far.
Lobbyists and registrants report their political contributions twice a year (form LD-203). A contribution is listed here when the report was filed by a lobbyist named on this bill's lobbying reports or by a registrant that filed one of them, and its payee is the member's own committee as the FEC lists it, under the exact-name rule. The contribution's date is as reported and can fall before or after the lobbying.