Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for the San Francisco Bay-Delta Distinct Population Segment of the Longfin Smelt".
Sponsored by Rep. LaMalfa, Doug [R-CA-1] RRepublican, introduced . Policy area, as Congress files it: Animals.
Status is read from the official actions by their Library of Congress codes: Became Public Law (36000) or a law number on the bill reads "Became law"; Vetoed (31000) reads "Vetoed"; Presented to President (28000) reads "Sent to the President"; passed or agreed to in the House (8000) and in the Senate (17000) reads "Passed both chambers"; one of them alone reads "Passed the House" or "Passed the Senate" ("Agreed to" for a resolution); reported to the House (5000) or the Senate (14000) reads "Reported by committee"; anything else reads "Introduced".
Source: Congress.gov data service (Library of Congress). Text versions: our copies of govinfo.gov’s files. Our copy was saved October 16, 2026.
Cosponsors
8 cosponsors.
| Member | Joined |
|---|---|
| Ken Calvert RRepublicanOriginal cosponsor | |
| Vince Fong RRepublicanOriginal cosponsor | |
| Darrell Issa RRepublicanOriginal cosponsor | |
| Young Kim RRepublicanOriginal cosponsor | |
| Tom McClintock RRepublicanOriginal cosponsor | |
| David G. Valadao RRepublicanOriginal cosponsor | |
| Kevin Kiley RRepublican | |
| Jay Obernolte RRepublican |
Text
| Version | Date | Our copy |
|---|---|---|
| Engrossed in House | Read our copyThe official file | |
| Introduced in House | Read our copyThe official file |
Actions
- Received in the Senate.
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 195 (Roll no. 113). (text: CR H1781)
- Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 195 (Roll no. 113). (text: CR H1781)
- The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 78.
- Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 60, H.J. Res. 78, H.J. Res. 87, H.J. Res. 88 and H.J. Res. 89. The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 60, H.J. Res. 78, H.J. Res. 87, H.J. Res. 88, and H.J. Res. 89 under a closed rule with one hour of debate and one motion to recommit on each joint resolution.
- Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 354. (consideration: CR H1781-1786)
- Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 354 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 60, H.J. Res. 78, H.J. Res. 87, H.J. Res. 88 and H The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 60, H.J. Res. 78, H.J. Res. 87, H.J. Res. 88, and H.J. Res. 89 under a closed rule with one hour of debate and one motion to recommit on each joint resolution.
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- Introduced in House
- Introduced in House
Committees
- Natural Resources Committee (House)Referred To, March 21, 2025
Hearings
We hold hearing records only for bills that became law.
Who lobbied on this bill
Not checked yetNo lobbying report we hold names H.J.Res. 78.